|
It is STPI's endeavor to provide you with information, however,
it is necessary that the information presented is not misused.
Due to certain misuses, which have come to our attention, you are
required to read the following disclaimer thoroughly each time before
viewing this list.
Please scroll this Web page down to read all the statements.
Purpose
The intent and purpose of providing this list is as follows:
 |
To demonstrate use
of the models and appraisal methods developed by the Software |
| |
Engineering Institute
(SEI) |
 |
As a public service
to the engineering community to assist in their improvement
efforts |
 |
Any other use or
perception of this list is outside the scope of this intent
and will |
| |
not be supported. |
 |
Simply put, this
is nothing more than a list of organizations who have publicly
|
| |
announced their maturity
levels. |
 |
After the organization's
announcement was made, a representative from the organization |
| |
completed a form
to be added to this list. |
What this List can not be used for
 |
This list can not
be used as some form of certification or verification by the
organization |
| |
listed as proof of
their maturity rating |
 |
This list can not
be perceived as an indicator of all or an exact count of organizations
in |
| |
in the world that
are using SEI models or appraisal methods |
 |
To restate this in
another way, this list can not be used to determine exactly
how many |
| |
companies there are
at the different levels and who they are |
 |
An all inclusive
list that has a high degree of accuracy (meaning every organization
in |
| |
the world using SEI
models and appraisal methods are accounted for) simply does |
| |
not exist to our
knowledge and the SEI has no intent to provide support for such
a task |
 |
In all cases, you
should consider performing an evaluation appraisal if you want
|
| |
to verify an organization's
maturity rating. |
About Certification
The terms SEI certified and CMM® certification are simply incorrect
since there is no such thing.
 |
The SEI does not
certify organizations and can not because it is a federally
funded |
| |
research and development
center |
 |
The SEI only licenses
and authorizes lead appraisers to conduct appraisals |
 |
The SEI nor any other
organization is a "certifying authority" of the results
from an appraisal |
 |
The SEI does not
confirm the accuracy of the maturity levels reported in this
list |
 |
The SEI does not
use information stored within its Process Appraisal Information
System |
| |
nor any other information
obtained in confidence to produce this list |
About Verification
The main intended goal and purpose of the models and appraisal
methods developed by the SEI is for self improvement. The outcome,
which is entirely dependent on the organization that follows these
practices, is to raise the level of quality of the products developed
with a better ability to predict the time and budget needed to develop
the product. The goal focuses less on a perceived business advantage
and more towards the ability to reliably develop products in a repeatable
fashion with continual improvement versus doing the same in a chaotic
state.
For most models developed by the SEI there are two basic appraisal
methods:
 |
For Self Improvement
|
 |
For Evaluation |
The second can be performed by an organization,
if they wish, for source selection and verification of another organization's
appraisal results/maturity level.
Maintaining a certain maturity status is a continuous process. Therefore
once a certain level is reached, appraisals are still necessary
to know if the maturity is being maintained over time.
Organizations who wish to be placed on this list:
 |
Must first publicly
announce their maturity level in a "publicly distributed"
article. |
| |
A correct statement
to use in a press release is that "the appraisal was performed
by an |
| |
SEI authorized lead
appraiser". An incorrect statement would be that the "organization
is SEI |
| |
or CMM certified". |
 |
The organization
must then volunteer to complete the Web form (see below) and
provide |
| |
the name of the "publicly
distributed" article (publisher, publication, article title,
page |
| |
number, date of article)
and the company AND division name of the organization. |
Definition of "publicly distributed" articles:
 |
Information which
has been released into a public forum |
 |
The material can
be seen by and can be obtained by anyone outside of the given
|
| |
organization or corporate
area |
 |
Information has been
released in a non-proprietary document. Examples: Web site, |
| |
press release, IEEE
Software, CrossTalk, etc. |
Compiled list of Organizations who have publicly Announced their
Maturity Levels after having an Appraisal Performed
I HAVE THOROUGHLY READ THE DISCLAIMER ABOVE,UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE
OF THIS LIST
AND WILL COMMUNICATE THIS PURPOSE TO OTHERS WHEN REFERRING TO THIS
INFORMATION.
|